Bankruptcy counsel is hired in the hours before a petition, not the weeks after.

A bankruptcy practice still lives on timing. Counsel is often retained in the hours or days before a petition. Corporate work still comes from CFOs, general counsel, and lenders who already know your speed. Consumer work still comes from other attorneys, accountants, and planners. Those channels have a ceiling. Licensed counsel on this hub does not run a debtor list. That is a different ethics conversation from an operating firm.

We do not write to those debtors, and we do not mail the CFO the week of the forbearance. The company or household in the window has to find the firm on its own. So does the referring lawyer looking up from a file they cannot keep.

ABC, CRO, turnaround, receivership, and liquidation are different Visibility Program pages on this hub. This page is licensed counsel only. Do not read it as the offer for those practices.

How these deals actually work

Retention is the hours or days before a petition, sometimes the same day the board or the household decides. Corporate intake is a CFO, a GC, lender-side counsel, and often a referring attorney who will not keep the case: chapter, venue, first-day relief, and whether this firm can appear in that district. Consumer intake is a household in foreclosure, garnishment, or a failed guarantee, plus the family, PI, or general lawyer who sent them. Those are two practices that can live in one firm. They are not one generic funnel.

Corporate debtors have more venue latitude than most people expect: 28 U.S.C. § 1408 allows a Chapter 11 filing where the debtor has its domicile, principal place of business, principal assets, or where an affiliate already has a pending case, which is why corporate filings often land in a district with no obvious physical connection to the company. A consumer debtor is functionally tied to the district of actual residence. A firm advertising corporate work needs multi-district capability and has to say so. A firm advertising consumer work needs to be the name that shows up for someone searching near the courthouse they will actually use.

What a buyer is actually searching

The company types chapter 11 attorney, business bankruptcy lawyer, bankruptcy counsel for a default, forbearance, or a missed covenant. Today is the board conversation or the lender's letter. Last month they still thought the revolver would hold. They are not comparison shopping for "a lawyer." They are trying to find counsel who files this work in this district before the petition is forced.

The household types chapter 7, chapter 13, stop foreclosure, bankruptcy lawyer near the courthouse they will actually use. Today is a sale date, a garnishment, or a failed personal guarantee. Last month they were still calling the lender. LinkedIn is not for them. Google is.

The referring attorney types a different query: bankruptcy counsel to refer, chapter 11 lawyer in a specific district, consumer bankruptcy attorney who will take this file. They already have a client. They cannot keep the matter. They need a name they can send today. CLE and lunch-and-learns are how they already know three firms. Search and LinkedIn are how they find a fourth when those three are conflicted, full, or in the wrong district.

A generic "bankruptcy lawyer" campaign buys the mill's traffic and misses the corporate window, or dumps a consumer mill on a CFO. Two themes, custom keywords, in the districts actually filed.

Objections we hear

Bar rules do not let us advertise like that. Soliciting debtors is the problem this campaign does not run. Paid search for people already looking, and LinkedIn ads to referring lawyers, are a different question than a mailer to a distressed-company list. Lawyer-to-lawyer correspondence, in select circumstances, is a bar-rules exception with its own section below. The firm confirms what it can run; we do not represent that every channel is permitted everywhere.

This sounds like a bulk debtor list. It is not. No list of distressed companies. No list of consumer debtors. No mail to the CFO the week of the forbearance. A firm that wants that wants the outbound program, and licensed counsel on this hub is the wrong client for it.

Lender referrals used to be enough. They used to send more, and earlier. They still send, just less, and after the company has already started looking. Waiting on that introduction is how the petition window closes on someone else's letterhead.

We already rank for bankruptcy lawyer. Ranking for a generic term is how a mill eats the click. The corporate theme and the consumer theme, in the districts actually filed, are the spend. A firm that already owns the mill query and is a mill is in the wrong place.

Who this is actually for

Licensed bankruptcy counsel with a district they actually appear in, a matter profile they will name, and the capacity to return a call in the petition window. Corporate middle-market and consumer can both be the book. They cannot be faked as each other. A firm that does not file in a district should not bid it. A firm that will not take consumer should not look like a chapter 7 mill. A firm that will not take a middle-market chapter 11 should not bid the CFO query.

The lead worth the spend is a company or household in the window, or a referring attorney with a file they cannot keep, in a district actually filed. A prospect collecting names for next year is not that lead. ABC, CRO, turnaround, receivership, and liquidation firms are not this client. They have their own leaves. This page is the petition practice.

How the campaign runs

Google ads for the people in the window. Two themes, not one generic "bankruptcy lawyer" campaign: corporate and middle-market CFOs, GCs, and principals searching a forbearance, a default, or a board conversation about options, and consumer households searching a foreclosure, a garnishment, or a failed guarantee, in the districts actually filed. Keywords are custom to the petition, the district, and the kind of debtor taken. Details: paid search.

Foundational work runs in parallel: the website, local directories, and general search appearance, so the click lands on a practice that files this work and not a volume mill. Bios and listings written in the language of the filing, the district, and the matter profile, not "compassionate advocates." We help earn reviews and dispute fakes through platform channels; we do not fabricate a docket that has not been filed. A landing page may be included; a full website build is always quoted separately. Details: online profile development.

LinkedIn ads aimed at the business and referral side: CLE and lunch-and-learns for referring attorneys and lender-side counsel who send the file after the window. Paid placements only. We do not run LinkedIn message outreach, InMail, or connection-request sequences on your behalf. That is a different channel, and it is not part of this program.

Ads produce inbound in the window. Foundation work is why a CFO or a referring lawyer trusts the firm enough to call. LinkedIn is not a surface for the household searching at 11 p.m.

Ready to grow your pipeline?

Share a few details and we'll follow up with exactly how this works for a firm like yours.

Leave blank

Name *

Firm / Company *

Email *

Phone

Send

Why we're not generalists

Generalist agencies will not take the time to learn the § 1408 venue distinction, let alone build two campaign themes around it. The practice is specialized, the file count is small, and that diligence bores them. They want large spend and heavy traffic to one landing page. We run a tighter campaign for a firm that closes fewer files at a higher value, and the keywords reflect the district and chapter from day one.

How fast this can run

Ads can go live in under a week once keywords and spend are approved. What usually slows a launch is approval on your side, not the platforms. Directories, bios, and a site a buyer will trust take longer to finish, because that layer is why the click converts into a call.

Lawyer-to-lawyer, in select circumstances

Lawyers may solicit other lawyers. In select circumstances, when the target is referring counsel rather than the debtor, direct mail or similar correspondence to other lawyers can be part of the work. That is an exception, not the default. It is not a list of distressed companies. It is not a list of consumer debtors. It is not LinkedIn message outreach. Bar rules still vary; the firm confirms what it can run, and we do not represent that any channel is permitted everywhere.

How this is billed

This is Visibility Program work, not the outbound program. You pay ad spend directly to the platforms (Google and, where we run it, LinkedIn). ROI Wire is billed on a retainer that scales with that spend, not a flat project fee, not a percentage of closed files, and not an outbound retainer.

A landing page may be included at no additional cost. A full website build is always quoted and billed separately. Foundational services, copywriting, CRM, multichannel sequences, and web design, sit under this track as the credibility layer, not as a correspondence program.

Scope is on the Visibility Program. Search mechanics are on paid search. Surfaces are on online profile development.

What is not included

We do not build a solicitation list of distressed companies or consumer debtors. We do not write, mail, or phone CFOs, GCs, or households who did not ask. We do not file the petition, sit the case, or appear in the district. We make the firm findable. The firm does the work.

This is not the turnaround, CRO, ABC, or liquidation leaf on this hub. Those are different pages, and they are not licensed-counsel work.

Program pages

Visibility Program

The full model: what you pay, what we bill, and who this actually fits.

Paid search

The mechanics behind the click: keywords, spend, and a retainer that scales with it.

Online profile development

What a buyer checks after the click and before the call: directories, bios, and reputation.