The board already lost confidence. Now it's searching for who's next.

Incumbent counsel rotates through the same five names until a conflict, a bandwidth problem, or a board that wants someone new breaks the rotation. Google ads reach the board and the sponsor at that exact moment. The firm that's findable when the rotation breaks is the one that gets the call.

A CRO mandate opens when the board has already lost confidence, the lender has already tightened covenants, or the sponsor has already marked the position down. The usual door is incumbent counsel, the company's own accountants, or an operating partner who worked a prior deal with someone. Each of those doors rotates through the same three or four names. The law firm merges. The operating partner retires. The next file does not come with advance warning, and when it lands, the board searches instead of waiting for a call that may not come.

We do not write to boards in forbearance. We do not mail an independent director the week the lender's patience runs out. The board, the sponsor, or the lender looking for an interim officer has to find the firm on its own, at the moment it searches. So does counsel, when the rotation is the wrong five people for this file.

Turnaround management, operators who work inside the company without taking the officer title, is a separate page. Restructuring advisory from outside the seat is a different page. Licensed counsel is bankruptcy law firms.

How these deals actually work

An independent director, a sponsor, lender-side counsel, and incumbent company counsel are the usual room. Cash runway, the 13-week model as live operating work rather than a slide, lender reporting, and whether this specific person can sit in the seat by Monday are the file. This is an officer title with fiduciary duties to the company, not a consulting engagement and not the turnaround operator role that never takes the title.

Board or sponsor with a seat open now

A forbearance letter, a going-concern qualification, or a board that has already voted no confidence in existing management is driving the search tonight, not next quarter.

Counsel whose rotation just ran out

A conflict, a bandwidth problem, or a client who explicitly asked for someone other than the last name used means the usual three names are not available for this file.

A board appointing a CRO pre-petition by resolution needs no bankruptcy court involvement at all. A CRO whose fees are paid from estate funds after a filing is a different matter: Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2014(a) requires disclosure of the firm's connections to the debtor, creditors, and other parties in interest, and depending on how the engagement is structured, formal employment approval under 11 U.S.C. § 327 can be required before the first invoice is paid. That distinction changes both the intake conversation and how fast the mandate can start, and it is specific to this seat. It does not apply to turnaround operators or outside advisors who are never retained as an estate professional.

If this describes your practice

A 20-minute call is enough to determine fit. We will tell you directly if the program does not make sense for what you do. Arrange it here.

What a buyer is actually searching

Chief restructuring officer, interim CRO, interim restructuring officer, turnaround CEO. Today is a forbearance letter, a going-concern opinion from the auditor, or a board vote that management has to go. Last quarter the same board still trusted the existing team to hold the line.

Lender-side and company counsel search for a name they have not already sent twice this year. That search happens on LinkedIn and on Google from the lawyer's desk, not through a letter to the board.

A generic "turnaround" campaign mixes this officer title with operators who never take it, and wastes spend on clicks that were never going to convert to this specific seat. If the firm sits the title, the campaign bids the title. If it does not, that is a different leaf on this hub.

Objections we hear

Counsel already has five names. Those five names are the ceiling, not the competition. The next mandate is the one those five cannot take: a conflict, an industry they do not know, a bandwidth problem, or a board that explicitly wants someone new.

We will wait for the sponsor to call. Sponsors call the person from the last deal first. A new independent director, or a lender workout officer who has never worked with this sponsor before, does not have that number.

This is the same as turnaround management. An operator working inside the company without the officer title is a different page, with a different buyer and different keywords. Mixing the two means the campaign bids on searches that were never going to convert.

Who this is actually for

Firms that actually sit CRO and interim restructuring officer mandates, with the fiduciary and disclosure obligations that come with the title. The lead worth the spend is a board, sponsor, or lender with a live seat to fill, or counsel who has to recommend someone this week. A healthy company shopping for a fractional CFO is a different search entirely, and this campaign is not built to catch it.

This page is a poor fit for a firm that wants a mailing list of every independent director currently in forbearance built for them. That is outbound correspondence to a board in crisis, and it is not what this campaign runs.

A firm that cannot name the industries and mandate sizes it will actually take wastes a sponsor's week and its own ad spend. If a middle-market manufacturing file is not a fit, the campaign should not look like it is. If the firm only sits the title and does not bring an operating team, the page should say so before the click, not after the call.

How the campaign runs

Google ads for the people already searching. Not one generic "restructuring" campaign: boards and independent directors searching a CRO or interim CEO by name, and PE operating partners or lender special-assets officers searching a firm they can put in front of a borrower, sized to the mandates actually taken. Keywords are custom to the work, with brand and competitor-brand bidding only when the strategy calls for it. Details: paid search.

Foundational work runs in parallel: the website, local directories, and general search appearance, so the click lands on a firm that reads like a CRO practice and not a volume mill. Bios and listings written in the language of the mandate, the cash model, and the creditor process. A landing page may be included; a full website build is always quoted separately. Details: online profile development.

LinkedIn ads aimed at referring counsel: lunch-and-learns for restructuring and bankruptcy lawyers who send the mandate after they already know five names. Paid placements only. We do not run LinkedIn message outreach, InMail, or connection-request sequences on your behalf. That is a different channel, and it is not part of this program.

Ads produce inbound while the search is live. Foundation work is why a board, a sponsor, or a referring lawyer trusts the firm enough to actually call.

Ready to grow your pipeline?

Share a few details and we'll follow up with exactly how this works for a firm like yours.

Why we're not generalists

Generalist agencies will not take the time to learn how a CRO mandate is actually won. The practice is specialized, the file count is small, and the intake distinction between a pre-petition and a post-petition retention bores them. They want large spend and a lot of traffic hitting one landing page. We run a tighter campaign for a firm that closes fewer files at a higher value, and the keywords reflect that from the first day of the campaign, not after a quarter of wasted spend.

How fast this can run

Ads can go live in under a week once keywords and spend are approved. What usually slows a launch is approval on your side, not the platforms. Directories, bios, and a site a board will trust take longer to finish, because that layer is why the click converts into a call.

How this is billed

This is Visibility Program work, not the outbound program. You pay ad spend directly to the platforms (Google and, where we run it, LinkedIn). ROI Wire is billed on a retainer that scales with that spend, not a flat project fee, not a percentage of closed mandates, and not an outbound retainer.

A landing page may be included at no additional cost. A full website build is always quoted and billed separately. Foundational services, copywriting, CRM, multichannel sequences, and web design, sit under this track as the credibility layer, not as a correspondence program.

Scope is on the Visibility Program. Search mechanics are on paid search. Surfaces are on online profile development.

What is not included

We do not build a solicitation list of distressed boards, lenders, or sponsors. We do not write, mail, or phone independent directors who did not ask. We do not sit as CRO, run the cash model, or appear in the case. We make the firm findable when the search happens. The firm does the work from there.

This is not turnaround management, restructuring advisory, or licensed bankruptcy counsel. Those are different pages on this hub.

Program pages

Visibility Program

The full model: what you pay, what we bill, and who this actually fits.

Paid search

The mechanics behind the click: keywords, spend, and a retainer that scales with it.

Online profile development

What a buyer checks after the click and before the call: directories, bios, and reputation.

Forbearance letter already on the CFO's desk?

Google ads for the board and the sponsor searching tonight. Lunch-and-learns for referring counsel. Not a letter to the company in distress.

Discuss Our Visibility Program
From the Desk